What this guide covers
What you’ll be able to do
- Choose a constraint worth the quarter
- Assign outputs and acceptance criteria
- Set conditions for expanding or reconsidering
The Playbook’s eight moves are connected, but they do not need eight simultaneous projects. Use psychology to understand the next patient decision and economics to choose an improvement worth the effort.
Skip to a section
Chapter 01
Choose the part of the journey that matters now
Begin with the practice’s goal and current constraint. Do you need more relevant discovery, better understanding before inquiry, clearer booking or stronger attendance? Identify the evidence behind that choice and the patient experience you want to improve.
- 01
Choose one constraint
Name the patient or operating problem that most limits useful growth now. Support it with the current journey and records rather than a general ambition to do more marketing.
- 02
Define the desired change
Write what the person or team should experience differently by the end of the quarter. Make the outcome understandable before listing production tasks.
- 03
Keep other ideas visible
Record attractive ideas outside the active plan. Deferring a channel is easier when the reason and condition for reconsideration are explicit.
In a fictional plan, Dr. Casey’s team hears the same first-visit questions repeatedly and spends time restarting conversations. Maya’s journey suggests the priority: connect a useful doctor explanation, a practical page and a prepared response. That is more focused than promising to overhaul every channel this quarter.
See it in action
Give the next 90 days one priority.
Choose a campaign idea your team can put into action.
Know what you want the next review to resolve.
Make time to learn before expanding the plan.
Sample creative. Fictional practices; no client results implied.
Examples & steps
Choose a priority that changes the work
A quarter is long enough to complete meaningful work and short enough that focus matters. A useful priority changes what you will produce, what you will postpone and what evidence you will review. “Grow the practice” is an ambition. “Make the inquiry-to-appointment path clear and dependable” is a priority that can organize a project.
Start with the current constraint. Is the practice difficult to discover? Is the explanation weak? Are inquiries waiting for responses? Is the booking route confusing? Is capacity already tight? Bring current evidence and the team’s observations together before choosing the headline objective.
| Observed situation | Possible quarter priority | Work that follows |
|---|---|---|
| People cannot explain what the first visit involves. | Make the practice and first appointment understandable. | Doctor explanation, page, practical details and connected creative. |
| Inquiries arrive but responses are inconsistent. | Build a dependable receiving process. | Answer source, ownership, backup, handoff and route checks. |
| The route works and suitable capacity is available. | Test a coherent introduction to more relevant people. | Creative, distribution, measurement and review within approved scope. |
| The calendar cannot support additional demand. | Align marketing with usable capacity. | Scheduling review, availability guidance and demand decisions. |
Name the work you are not doing this quarter
Keep a visible parking list for useful ideas that do not serve the current priority. This is not a rejection of their value. It protects the capacity to finish the chosen work. If a new idea becomes urgent, make the tradeoff explicit: what will move, why, and who decides?
Write a definition of complete. For a first-visit explanation, completion might mean an approved film, a matching page, a clear action route and a verified receiving process. “Content created” is less useful because it does not establish whether anyone can use the work.
Chapter 02
Days 1–30: establish the foundation
Collect the starting numbers and useful observations. Review the current message, destination and response with the team. Confirm what the practice can offer and decide which questions the new work must answer.
- 01
Establish the baseline
Define the cohort, stage counts, costs and recurring questions before making changes. Record missing information so it does not later masquerade as a performance difference.
- 02
Complete the prerequisites
Confirm practice facts, appointment capacity, content sources and receiving responsibilities. Give each required piece an owner and a clear acceptance point.
- 03
Finish one complete sequence
Produce the introduction, deeper explanation and working response path together. The first month should leave something usable, not a folder of disconnected drafts.
Build the smallest complete sequence: an introduction, a deeper explanation and a functioning next step. Plan the doctor’s recording time and the team’s review time alongside production. A beautiful opening asset with nowhere useful to continue is unfinished work.
Examples & steps
Use the first month to remove uncertainty and finish the foundation
The first phase should produce enough clarity to operate. It is not a month of strategy documents without a working asset. Gather the relevant facts, inspect the current journey, choose the central message and complete one coherent route.
| Work package | Concrete output | Completion check |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline | A defined current-state record with stages, costs and known gaps. | The team agrees what each measure means. |
| Message | A specific creative brief grounded in practice facts. | A newcomer can explain the invitation. |
| Destination | A useful page that answers the campaign’s question. | The page works on a phone and the action is accurate. |
| Receiving | Owner, approved answers, backup and exception route. | The team can rehearse a fictional inquiry end to end. |
| Review | A learning question and decision record. | Someone owns the next interpretation and action. |
Sequence dependencies
The page cannot accurately describe an offer whose inclusions are unresolved. The confirmation cannot be correct if no one has decided whether the form requests contact or books a time. The creative cannot promise an appointment the practice cannot provide. Put these dependencies in order and resolve them before polishing the final presentation.
Keep the first complete version small enough to finish
One coherent campaign packet is a better foundation than twenty disconnected drafts. Use the approved creative collection to select the right human context, then connect it to a specific explanation and response. Expand the range once the route is understandable and operational.
At the first checkpoint, open the actual work. Do not rely on a slide that says the website, automation and campaign are complete. The team should be able to follow the route and describe who handles the exceptions.
Chapter 03
Days 31–60: put one coherent idea to work
Choose a clear hypothesis. For the fictional practice, explaining the first visit before asking for contact may help inquiries arrive with more useful questions. The team can observe those questions and the progression to suitable appointments.
- 01
Run the agreed sequence
Use the planned message, destination and response together. Record the actual start date and any change that could affect interpretation later.
- 02
Inspect real use
Review inquiries and the receiving experience during the test. Correct genuine defects promptly while keeping those repairs visible in the record.
- 03
Resist unrelated changes
Keep discretionary variations tied to the learning question. If several things change together, explain the limitation instead of attributing the result to one favourite element.
Keep the main idea stable long enough to learn. Record meaningful changes to creative, page, schedule or response so you can interpret what happened. Check the actual journey during the period: technical or staffing problems can otherwise look like a weak message.
See it in action
Build the pieces in the right order.
Have the page ready for the campaign you are launching.
Name who delivers it and how you will check it.
Examples & steps
Use the middle phase to learn from real use
Once the agreed route is operating, protect enough stability to understand what happens. Record meaningful changes and avoid changing the offer, creative, destination and receiving process simultaneously without a clear reason. Otherwise a better or worse outcome becomes difficult to interpret.
Review at a cadence suited to the activity and the practice’s capacity. A broken route needs prompt repair. A small number of incomplete patient journeys may need more observation before a business conclusion. Distinguish operational defects from questions that require time.
Weekly working review template
What was delivered? [specific work]. What did people encounter? [current version]. What happened? [defined observations]. What remains pending? [incomplete outcomes]. What did the team hear? [de-identified questions]. What needs repair now? [defect]. What decision can wait for better evidence? [uncertainty]. Who owns the next action? [role].
Run one meaningful experiment
Choose a question that affects the current priority. If the issue is understanding, test a clearer explanation or placement. If the issue is response, test an approved answer source or ownership change. If the route works and the issue is discovery, test a distinct creative idea within the agreed campaign plan.
Keep the experiment record concrete: original version, change, reason, affected route, start date, observation and next decision. A new image is not an experiment unless you know what question it is intended to answer.
Bring the receiving team’s experience into the review
The report may show a booking rate while the team knows that a particular time band is unavailable. The content may look clear while the same question keeps arriving. Combining those observations makes the next decision better. Do not use the dashboard to silence useful operating context.
Chapter 04
Days 61–90: interpret before expanding
Review a group that has had enough time to progress. Compare inquiry quality, booking, attendance, workload and relevant costs with the starting picture. Ask whether the observations support the original idea or suggest a different problem.
- 01
Use a mature comparison
Select groups that have had reasonable time to book and attend. Keep definitions and costs consistent before comparing the starting picture with the later result.
- 02
Read numbers with experience
Combine progression and cost with inquiry fit, recurring questions and workload. A single improving percentage does not show whether the whole practice experience improved.
- 03
Choose the next decision
Keep, revise, expand or stop for a stated reason. A quarter that rules out an expensive direction can still leave the practice in a stronger position.
Choose the next move explicitly: keep the sequence, improve a weak connection, test a new opening or pause an idea that is not earning its place. A useful quarter can rule out a direction. It does not need a dramatic success story to produce a better decision.
Examples & steps
Use the final phase to decide what deserves more investment
The ninety-day review should answer what changed, what the practice learned and what should happen next. It should not become a celebration of activity counts detached from the original priority.
Return to the starting record. Compare the same definitions and, where possible, similar observation windows. Separate completed outcomes from people still progressing. Note changes in availability, offers, staffing or season that affect interpretation. A clear account of those factors is more useful than a clean-looking chart that hides them.
| Decision | When it may fit | What to carry forward |
|---|---|---|
| Continue | The work is functioning and the evidence supports its current role. | Maintain the verified route and review the next defined question. |
| Refine | A specific limitation remains visible. | Change the relevant connection and preserve the rest. |
| Expand | The route is useful, the practice can serve more demand and economics support discussion. | Increase scope deliberately with capacity and measurement intact. |
| Stop or replace | The activity does not earn its place or depends on an unsuitable assumption. | Preserve the learning and remove the ongoing burden. |
Keep output and outcome distinct
A finished guide, functioning form and clear response process are valuable outputs. More attended conversations or a different acquisition cost are outcomes to measure separately. Do not dismiss completed infrastructure because its downstream effect is still developing, and do not claim business improvement simply because the work was delivered.
Choose the next constraint
If the original gap is repaired, identify what now limits the journey. The next quarter may need a different emphasis. A useful plan evolves from what the practice has learned rather than repeating the same task list with new dates.
Chapter 05
Protect attention as well as budget
A plan needs a not-now list. If the priority is a connected first-visit sequence, an unrelated new platform can divide the attention needed to finish it. Record ideas for later without adding them to the active promise.
- 01
Protect production attention
Limit active work to what the priority requires. New ideas should compete with existing commitments rather than silently expanding the team’s workload.
- 02
Assign decisions as well as tasks
Name who can approve facts, resolve a delay and change scope. An owner who cannot obtain a needed decision may not be able to finish the task.
- 03
Review at a useful cadence
Use a short weekly check for blockers and a separate outcome review when evidence has matured. Avoid making every meeting a referendum on the entire strategy.
Give each output an owner and an acceptance point. The doctor confirms the explanation, the production owner completes the asset, and the receiving team confirms how the conversation continues. Schedule a short weekly review around the one question that needs a decision.
See it in action
Learn before you add more.
Turn one promising idea into a clear 90-day priority.
Examples & steps
Build the plan around decisions and available attention
A plan can fail even with a reasonable budget if every important decision waits for an owner who has no time to review it. Name the decisions that require the clinician, the owner, the front desk and the marketing partner. Prepare reviewable work so each person can make the decision they actually own.
Approval request template
“Please review [specific asset or decision]. The intended job is [purpose]. We need you to verify [your responsibility]. The proposed next step is [action]. The material difference from the current version is [change]. Please mark the exact point that needs correction.”
This is more useful than asking the owner to “take a look” at a large folder. Keep the full campaign together so the relationship between creative, page and response is visible.
Use a short change rule
When a new request arrives, ask whether it repairs a defect, satisfies a necessary dependency or changes the quarter’s priority. Defects and essential facts may need immediate attention. A new campaign idea may belong in the parking list. A genuine priority change should be recorded with the work it replaces.
Give the plan a practical home
Keep the current priority, owners, active work, decisions and next review in one place the team uses. Link to the actual assets rather than copying them into competing documents. The plan should help the team finish work, not become another report to maintain.
End each review with a small number of clear actions. A quarter gains momentum when the next decision is obvious and the work has an owner.
Put it to work
Write the quarter your team can actually execute
Create a one-page plan with a priority, complete deliverables, owners and review decisions.
Choose the quarter’s question
Write one question the practice needs to answer. For example: “Can we make the first-visit route easier to understand and operate?” Use current evidence to explain why that question matters. Keep other ambitions visible without making them competing priorities.
Define three phases by their outputs
Days 1–30: inspect the current route, verify facts and complete one coherent packet. Days 31–60: operate the approved work, record observations and make a bounded improvement. Days 61–90: compare the evidence with the starting question and decide what to continue, refine, expand or stop. Adjust timing to the real dependencies; the phases are a planning aid, not a promise of results by a particular date.
Complete the working plan
Priority: [specific change]. Starting evidence: [current observations]. Complete deliverables: [assets and functioning route]. Practice input: [facts, recordings and approvals]. Receiving owner: [role and backup]. Investment and capacity: [approved limits and real availability]. First review: [date or trigger]. Learning question: [what the work should resolve]. Decision at the end: [continue, refine, expand or stop a defined activity]. Parked ideas: [what waits and why].
Test the plan against a busy week
Imagine the owner is unavailable for several days or a team member is absent. Can the current work continue? Are the next approvals specific? Can someone find the actual asset and its current version? If not, clarify ownership and reduce the number of simultaneous workstreams.
Run the final review from evidence
Open the original priority, the completed work and the defined observations. State what was achieved, what remains uncertain and what changed in the operating environment. Choose the next move and name the reason. A useful ninety-day plan ends with a better decision about the practice’s next chapter.
Notes aren't saved automatically. Download them before leaving. Don't include patient details.
06 / Put it to work
Give the quarter one priority and clear decisions
Finish a connected improvement, learn what it changes and use that learning to choose the next move.
Where is your ninety-day plan losing focus?
Your next move
Everything is a priority
Return to the current patient-growth constraint and choose the outcome worth the quarter. Several attractive projects can each make sense while collectively preventing the team from completing one useful, connected improvement on time.
- Name the main constraint and evidence.
- Choose the smallest complete improvement.
- Create an explicit not-now list.
Put your plan in motion
Your first campaign. Our compliments.
The Defibrillator connects 12 custom social posts, 3 articles, a landing page, a lead form and 3 follow-up emails. Built for your practice.
Request your kit with your name, practice, email and website. No call. No purchase.
Explore my free campaignThe method behind the work.
Continue with the original guides and the source material behind this lesson. Worked examples are teaching illustrations unless explicitly attributed.
Internet Playbook ↗Open the complete original guide.The Internet Playbook for Chiropractors ↗Current 18-page V13. Pages 3–7, 14–15. The eight moves connect marketing, conversion, patient experience and advocacy.The R.O.I. Method for Chiropractors ↗Original R.O.I. framework; PDF pages 7–12. Relevancy, Omnipresence and Intimacy describe communication responsibilities, not a financial return calculation.Sources and context
Dr. Stacey on the staged plan, attribution and refinementHistorical operating value informing the planning approach; the ninety-day phases are a current editorial framework.
Dr. Stacey on testing and reportsThe value of continued management; no current reporting cadence or result is promised.
